I recognize the need for advertisers to get creative with their methods in a time when consumers encounter ad impression thousands of times a day. But my personal pet peeve has become the gigantic pop-up ads which are now appearing on major news outlet sites. I visit most of these sites almost daily, and am continually greeted by some huge ad of which I can barely find the ‘close’ button. I think I liked the pop-up windows better!

Now, this is annoying to me, usually because it takes a few seconds to close (when I can find the button) and well, I don’t like things popping up at me that I didn’t click on. But I find myself thinking about my mom, a technologically stunted individual who loves her hotmail, but was completely lost when MSN did a redesign not long ago. (I love you mommy!)

I think if these ads were to pop-up at her, she’d fall off the chair and give up the internet forever.

Are they really necessary?

Maybe companies should look into taking the cost of their pop-up ads and investing it into an effective PR program.

Last week, I saw an article in AdAge that suggested that one of the world’s most famous ‘touch up’ artists, Pascal Dangin, had a hand in making the women in the Real Beauty campaign look gorgeous. Even though Unilever and Dangin have made statements denying the reports, AdAge maintains that it will still “go down as a footnote in advertising history or rate among its biggest scandals, alongside Campbell’s marbles in the soup.”

Really.

Since the success of their Evolution campaign, Dove has been the viral video darling of the marketing world. Everyone wants their online efforts to come out smelling like 1/4 moisturizing lotion. But that sort of success can’t be plucked out of the cosmetics aisle and let’s face it – everybody’s a bit jealous. And my feeling is that, last week when this rumour emerged, a lot of people would have gladly seen Dove go on trial for their alleged mistake.

Even if they did do skin tone touch ups or got rid of minor blemishes on the Real Beauty models … would that really make their campaign somehow bogus? For me the idea is the most beautiful thing about the Dove brand and their recent marketing efforts. Some readers of AdAge’s coverage of the ’scandal’ agreed:

Several readers commenting on Ad Age’s Thursday story saw the controversy as a tempest in a teapot. “The issue is being massively blown out of proportion,” said one. “Retouching to adjust skin tones, remove shadows, or combine two or more photos from the same session for the sake of shot composition is commonplace and completely ethical.”

“I think we are losing sight of what this campaign is really about — loving your own body,” said another reader. “Even if the photo was retouched a bit, it still conveys the fact that all women are beautiful, no matter what size or shape.”

Another great follow up story that looks at how Dove/Oglivy/Unilever could have dealt with the situation can be found here.