PR Girlz

Unique perspectives from women in PR

PR Pride

Posted by PRGirlz Alumni on July 31st, 2006

I’m going to preface this by saying that I mean no offence to anyone who works in advertising. Some may say I fit into that mould, but unless I’m trying to get out of doing a phone survey (works like a charm), I will vehemently argue against you. I wrote a post a few weeks ago about Defining PR- this may be a bit of a follow-up as I continue on my quest to find the ideal universal definition. One thing that defines advertising is how blantant it can be; PR tends to be far more subtle. In fact the best PR affects consumers without them ever knowing it took place. Advertising on the other hand? It wants to be in your face. Advertising is often considered a success if it just gets you talking about it. So I’m playing right into their hands…

There are several things that bother me about advertising but one in particular really gets my goat: when one company puts down its main competitor in an effort to push product. Biggest offender? Pepsi. From what I can see, they seem to spend the majority of their advertising time and budget on putting down Coke. Now I haven’t seen their budget- I don’t know the figures and I don’t plan on guessing. I’m only going on what I see- but what I see isn’t so creative. If you have to put down your main competition in order to sell your product, somthing’s wrong with your approach. Just tell us why you have the better one. To me, it comes off looking pathetic. Same goes for the Pepsi Challenge, where kioks in malls and at events would have you guess which sip tastes better, hoping of course, that you’ll “unknowingly” choose Pepsi. So let me get this straight…you know Coke is better and you need to prove that we can’t tell them apart so that we’ll buy yours? Personally, I prefer Coke and as long as Pepsi spends their dollars putting Coke down, they will lose my money along with my respect.

A newer offender is Apple. Now I have always had a PC. I know them better, they work for me. I have worked on an Apple, however, and they are nice- nice looking, nice to use. No complaints. They worked magic with the iPod, everyone but me has one, good for them, it’s also a nice little gadget. They have done great things to revamp their image over the last few years and kudos for that. But as soon as they started their advertising campaign with the older, conservative “PC Man” and the young, hip and cool “MAC Dude,” they lost me. Find a more creative way to tell us why you’re better; don’t put down your competition to do it! If I was considering an iPod when my wonderful little Creative Muvo dies, I’m not now.

It’s advertisements such as those that make me proud to be in PR. We don’t put down the competition to push our product. We have to find more creative ways to get it in the media and on consumer’s radar. Blatancy doesn’t work for us. And while I know that advertising people work very hard, PR people don’t have the option of taking the easy way out.

6 Responses to “PR Pride”

  1. Ed Lee

    I think it’s tough being number two in a duopoly. When your whole raison d’etre is providing a different value proposition to your competitor (not coke; not mcdonalds) it’s hard to not do some bashing.

    Apple’s case is a little different though – it’s not bashing a direct competitor. They’re trying to instigate mind change in consumer habits.

    Oh, and I’ve done my fair share of “competitive depositioning” in PR as well so I’m not entirely sure it’s confined to advertising, although that’s where the most memorable examples will come from.

    Ed

  2. shelby

    Hey i really agree with what you’re saying about advertising. Since I’ve started taking pr classes, I have been noticing a lot more pr and advertising campaigns, and I have really been noticing when companies advertise a product by putting their competition in a bad light, in my opinion this should be illegal. I’m a recruiter for Auburn University and the same principles apply. We don’t make ourselves look good by putting other universities down, we let our school and statistics speak for ourself, and I think companies should do the same thing.

  3. Ed Lee

    It used to be illegal in the UK but i think a little thing called “freedom of speech” got in the way of that practice.

    Ed

  4. Shaula Evans

    Joscelyn, I’m afraid that most American political campaign ads put Pepsi to shame.

  5. Joscelyn

    You’re right, Shaula; I totally forgot about political campaigns. During the national campaign in Canada in late 2005, the Conservatives (Republicans to Americans) used their ad time to bash the Liberals (Democrats). For the record, I’m American and can’t vote here. Also for the record, I wouldn’t have voted for Stephen Harper (Conservative). But that campaign used to really piss me off. I just wanted them to tell me what their plan was, not what they hated about their competition. Again, for the record, I hate to admit that Harper is doing okay…but that’s neither here nor there.

    Thanks for bringing up a great point!

  6. Danny Brown

    Good post with valid comments – I wrote a very similar post myself recently:

    http://pressreleaseprblog.com/2008/06/12/pr-and-advertising-same-thing/

    Although I’d have to disagree slightly with the Apple example – personally I think that’s some of the best “silent advertising” around today. As Ed Lee mentions, Apple aren’t actually putting their competitor down – they’re merely pointing out that their machines do everything just that little bit better. Give me that approach over Coke/Pepsi anyday! :)

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked with *

(will not be shown)